Evaluation

You will be graded on the work you turn in and presentation separately, then the grades will be averaged together for your final projectgrade. Below are the rubrics which will be used:
Hand-In Work Rubric

	50	30	20	10
Introduction	All questions were answered completely and rationale for the answers were clearly stated	All questions were answered completely, but rationale for all the answers were not clearly stated.	Not all questions were answered completely, or greater than 2 rationales for all the answers were not clearly stated.	All questions were not answered completely.
Task	All areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought.	At least one are of the task was not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought.	At least two areas of the task were not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a moderate level of thought.	The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little effort went into the development of the task.
Process: Teamwork	It is evident that a mutal effort and cohesive unit created the final product.	The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other's skills to a better degree.	The team had problems working together. Little collaboration occurred.	The final product is not the result of a collaborative effort. The group showed no evidence of collaboration.
Process: Originality	The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrates a high degree of originality.	The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The group may have improved upon a previous idea.	The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrates a low degree of originality.	There were no original ideas expressed in this project.
Grammar, Format, and Spelling	The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.	The final body of work had one error related to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.	The final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.	The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
				Total ------>

In-Class Presentation

	Beginning 10	Developing 20	Very Good 30	Exemplary 50
Organization	Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.	Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.	Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.	Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Content Knowledge	Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.	Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Student is at ease with content, but fails to elaborate.	Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) with explanations and elaboration.
Visuals	Student used no visuals	Student occasionally used visuals that rarely support text and presentation.	Visuals related to text and presentation.	Student used visuals to reinforce screen text and presentation.
Mechanics	Student's presentation had four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors.	Presentation had three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Presentation has no morethan two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Delivery	Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.	Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.	Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly.	Student used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms.
				Total ---->